Thursday, March 18, 2010

How Much Will the TARP Bailout Cost?





Good Evening Everyone!

This is a great piece I wanted to share with you. It talks about the actual cost of the Federal Bailout money. I encourage you to read.

Price tag of TARP bailout: $109 billion!

By Annalyn Censky, staff reporterMarch 18, 2010: 10:12 AM ET


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The government's unprecedented $700 billion economic bailout will actually cost taxpayers just 16% of that total, according to a Congressional Budget Office report released Wednesday.

The Treasury's losses on the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) will total $109 billion over the program's lifetime, CBO latest estimates show. That's up $10 billion from the agency's last projection, released in January.

CBO, which is charged with reviewing congressional budgets, has released a series of TARP cost calculations in the 17 months since the bailout began, each time updating its numbers with the latest data. At one point CBO expected the cost to be as high as $356 billion, but faster-than-expected bank repayments and other cost adjustments have drastically reduced the expected price tag.

TARP's two big moneysuckers are AIG and the auto industry.

AIG got TARP money in two forms: the government bought $40 billion in preferred stock and created a $30 billion line of credit for the company. CBO previously estimated the AIG bailout would cost the government $9 billion, but AIG hasn't paid the Treasury the quarterly dividends it owes. AIG's weak financial position prompted CBO to increase its loss projection to $36 billion -- more than half of the AIG bailout cost.

Other major losses -- a total of $34 billion -- will come from TARP assistance to the automotive industry, CBO said. The government committed $85 billion to bailing out the automakers.


On the flip slide, the highly unpopular capital infusion for banks will actually net the government $7 billion, CBO expects -- even including a $2 billion loss from CIT Group (CIT, Fortune 500), which declared bankruptcy, and Pacific Coast National Bancorp, which was taken over by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

CBO isn't the only agency attempting to tally up TARP's cost. The latest estimates from the Office of Management and Budget, released in early February, predict TARP will cost $18 billion more than CBO's estimates. The numbers from the two agencies differ because of different assumptions about the cost of some items and a varied timeframe for some of the data they evaluated.

Foreclosure help forecast
As for President Obama's mortgage modification program, the CBO estimates that the Treasury Department will use no more than $20 billion of TARP funds, less than half of the $50 billion originally allocated. That's because the CBO expects many fewer people will participate in the program than the government originally expected, a view held by many housing industry observers.

When Obama announced the program in February 2009, he said up to 4 million people could save their homes through the loan modification program, which lowers eligible borrowers' monthly payments to no more than 31% of their pre-tax income. But more recently, officials have backtracked and said up to 4 million people could qualify for trial modifications, during which loan servicers assess their borrowers' eligibility and ability to pay.

Through February, around 170,000 distressed homeowners have received long-term modifications under the program.

Another $1.5 billion in TARP funds will be used to provide grants to state housing agencies in California, Arizona, Nevada, Florida and Michigan. These agencies are tasked with coming up with programs to assist the unemployed, the underwater who owe more than their homes are worth, and the second-lien holders.

CNNMoney.com senior writer Tami Luhby contributed to this report.

It's March 18, 2010 and I am very BULLISH on Sacramento!

David Ohara
@dwo34
dwo34@aol.com

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Customer Service Lacking in Real Estate




Good Tuesday Morning Everyone!

I came across this article from RISMedia addressing the issue of customer service in the real estate industry. I knew from my personal dealings with certain agents in the Sacramento area, that service was lacking, but I did not know it was this shabby. My dealings with with these certain agents left me asking "How could these buyer's possibly want to work with their agent?" Poor communication skills, terrible penmanship, lack of understanding of the real estate purchase contract, leaving doors open and unlocked, and the list goes on and on. Folks, if you are serious about buying or selling a home, you need to connect with a Realtor who has the expertise to represent you properly. A poorly written offer or lack of communication can mean the difference between you having your offer accepted or declined. Here is the article from RISMedia.

RISMEDIA, March 16, 2010—It doesn’t take a genius to know that events of the past few years have greatly affected the public’s view of real estate agents. Now that image is below that of used car salesmen (except, perhaps, Toyota used car salesmen!) and many are publicly stating that the agent’s time is over, that maybe it’s time to take corrective action. What do you think?
Before exploring that, however, you should know that the study referenced above was conducted by the California Association of Realtors and reported in many newspapers (I’m quoting the Orange County Register, here). “California leads the nation,” we used to say around here, but lately, its in dubious distinctions like this one, it seems. It is possible that in other parts of the country, dissatisfaction is not quite this high.
The study reported on consumer responses to one simple proposition: “Yes, I would use the same agent” over the six-year period from 2004 to 2009. It reports that 79% of respondents said “Yes” in 2004 but only 22% said “Yes” in 2009. Statistics like these do not inspire loyalty campaigns or much hope for referrals, do they?
What happened?
According to the study, 64% of sellers said “the house took too long to sell” and 51% said, “We didn’t get the price we wanted.” Thus, the disaster fomented by Wall Street has been neatly transferred onto the backs of real estate agents. It’s no comfort to realize that while some Wall Street ‘Investment Banker’ is spending his seven-figure bonus on that house on the Vineyard and the newest Bentley, the public’s anger at the financial crisis has trickled down to those not responsible for it.
The very people you are working your butt off for, blame you for their unrealistic expectations and in many cases, agents are enabling that by not setting sellers straight on the new realities of real estate pricing and financing. It is doubtful that the consumer will wake up anytime soon. Anyone with an ARM can no longer afford can blame you. Anyone in a house worth 30% less than what they paid for it can now blame you as being the reason for their dilemma. That’s much easier than blaming their own greed or naiveté, of course, but who ever wants to take personal responsibility anymore? Certainly not consumers, it would appear!
Short-term consequences for real estate companies
Branding takes a hit
The financial crisis that produced the “Hate your real estate agent” trend also has reduced the power of Internet corporate real estate brands. Consumers today are more attracted to individuals than entities: no one cares about being friends with a company and no one thinks a company will treat them as well as a real person will (i.e., a buyer will search for “Wasilla AK Real Estate,” not “International Behemoth Real Estate agent in Wasilla AK”). The Internet shopper resists and resents any effort to make them go through even one unnecessary step to acquire the information they want and that includes being driven through hoops on the Intergalactic Amalgamated Real Estate Behemoth websites. The consumer today is more likely to identify with an individual agent than a corporate leviathan. For the individual agent, this is good.
Personal response and service have become vital to success
In our business, we see structures in brokerages and corporations that literally make us shake our heads and wonder how those organizations are surviving. One of these is the lackadaisical approach to inquiries from Internet buyers. Believe it or not, over 50% of Internet leads are never responded to in person and believe it or not, 50% of such inquiries are responded to in an average of 54 hours. This has enabled savvy agents to structure their leads and inquiries for their websites to be SMS texted to their powerful phones, where—with a simple touch—the inquirer can be called back in minutes. If you were an Internet buyer, would you wait days for a response that might never come or would you respond favorably to the agent who calls you personally within minutes and asks how they can assist you?
In the next few years, the business will return to a model where personal service is given at a high level and where the agent becomes the source for information. Just dumping people in an IDX or MLS doesn’t cut it anymore, folks—you must do the looking for them. For the hardworking agent, this is good.
More agents will develop the guts to just say ‘No’
When there’s nothing in the pipeline and the opportunity to take a listing for a property that is priced 30% higher than reality now dictates arises, it is very hard to walk away. After all, someone will take the listing, right? Please—let someone else take such listings. That same survey we’ve been referencing also revealed that an incredible 2 out of 3 homeowners originally listed their home with a different agent than the agent who had the listing when it finally sold. Imagine all the blood, sweat, tears and money wasted by agents who take unrealistically priced listings. This nonsense won’t stop until agents remember that a listing gained at an unrealistic price will only result in an unhappy customer, and another statistic for such studies. For the agent who wants to stay sane, this is good.
Long-term consequences
Skill, hard work and mastering technology to bring you prospects will become more important than spending hours blogging, posting listings, tinkering with websites and generally not selling. Technology that simply requires more involvement from the agent will languish – in large measure—because consumers aren’t driving the use of video, the endless hours of social networking, the ubiquitous IDX systems and other colossally unproductive drudges that agents are now told they must embrace; it’s the technology companies driving that.
The consumer wants help choosing a home and getting it financed from a knowledgeable and responsive agent. They want to pay a fair price; they want a deal that will appraise out; they do not want to waste their time on uneconomic transactions. Most of all, if they call or write in on your website, they want an instant and friendly response. In short, they want the service that used to be inherent in a real estate agent and they will continue to gravitate to a minority of agents who give such service. The Internet helps them find those agents, faster. Sometimes agents don’t know that their way has been made obsolete and they inadvertently give poor service. For example:
This week, an agent complained that he wasn’t getting sales for the Internet leads he was receiving. We asked him why he had not attended the free class on how to best follow up those leads. He replied: “I know how to follow up Internet leads! We send an immediate auto responder and put them on an MLS drip email system! I don’t need your @#%#@ training!”
Folks, kill all auto responders. Do not put people on drip email systems. Do not automate anything about the sales process until and unless you have spoken with the prospect and they have asked you to do so. This agent was wasting the fruit of his labors by not contacting people personally and consistently. Today, it’s a merciless marketplace and every one of those uncontacted leads is now speaking to another agent.
That’s just one simple example, but many others exist; repeat after me: “Succeeding today is about personal service, hard work, professional representation, and modest use of effective technology.”

Isn't this amazing! Remember, connect with a Realtor who can represent you appropriately and professionally. A home purchase is more than opening a lockbox and selling your home is more than putting a sign in the front yard. If you have questions about locating a Realtor in your area, contact me and I can connect you with a professional Realtor who will represent you well. Don't fall into the category mentioned in the article!

It is March 16, 2010 and I am very Bullish on Sacramento!

David Ohara
@dwo34
dwo34@aol.com


Friday, March 12, 2010

Home Buyer Tax Credit




Only a Very Little Time Remains!

Frequently Asked Questions

About the First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit

The Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 has extended the tax credit of up to $8,000 for qualified first-time home buyers purchasing a principal residence. The tax credit now applies to sales occurring on or after January 1, 2009 and on or before April 30, 2010. However, in cases where a binding sales contract is signed by April 30, 2010, a home purchase completed by June 30, 2010 will qualify.

For sales occurring after November 6, 2009, the Act establishes income limits of $125,000 for single taxpayers and $225,000 for married couples filing joint returns.

The income limits for sales occurring on or after January 1, 2009 and on or before November 6, 2009, are $75,000 for single taxpayers and $150,000 for married taxpayers filing joint returns.

The following questions and answers provide basic information about the tax credit. If you have more specific questions, we strongly encourage you to consult a qualified tax advisor or legal professional about your unique situation.

  1. Who is eligible to claim the $8,000 tax credit?
  2. What is the definition of a first-time home buyer?
  3. How is the amount of the tax credit determined?
  4. Are there any income limits for claiming the tax credit?
  5. The income limits for claiming the tax credit were raised when the tax credit was extended. Are the higher income limits retroactive?
  6. What is “modified adjusted gross income”?
  7. If my modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is above the limit, do I qualify for any tax credit?
  8. Can you give me an example of how the partial tax credit is determined?
  9. How is this home buyer tax credit different from the tax credit that Congress enacted in early 2009?
  10. How do I claim the tax credit? Do I need to complete a form or application? Are there documentation requirements?
  11. What types of homes will qualify for the tax credit?
  12. I read that the tax credit is "refundable." What does that mean?
  13. Instead of buying a new home from a home builder, I hired a contractor to construct a home on a lot that I already own. Do I still qualify for the tax credit?
  14. Can I claim the tax credit if I finance the purchase of my home under a mortgage revenue bond (MRB) program?
  15. I live in the District of Columbia. Can I claim both the Washington, D.C. first-time home buyer credit and this new credit?
  16. I am not a U.S. citizen. Can I claim the tax credit?
  17. Is a tax credit the same as a tax deduction?
  18. I bought a home in 2008. Do I qualify for this credit?
  19. Is there any way for a home buyer to access the money allocable to the credit sooner than waiting to file their 2009 or 2010 tax return?
  20. HUD is now allowing "monetization" of the tax credit. What does that mean?
  21. If I’m qualified for the tax credit and buy a home in 2009 (or 2010), can I apply the tax credit against my 2008 (or 2009) tax return?
  22. For a home purchase in 2009 or 2010, can I choose whether to treat the purchase as occurring in the prior or present year, depending on in which year my credit amount is the largest?
  23. How can two unmarried buyers allocate the tax credit if one qualifies for the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit and the other qualifies for the $6,500 repeat home buyer credit?
  24. Does a married couple qualify for any home buyer tax credit in the following situation? Spouse A has lived in and owned the same principal residence for at least five years. Spouse B has lived in and owned the same principal residence for less than five years.

  1. Who is eligible to claim the $8,000 tax credit?
    First-time home buyers purchasing any kind of home—new or resale—are eligible for the tax credit. To qualify for the tax credit, a home purchase must occur on or after January 1, 2009 and on or before April 30, 2010. For the purposes of the tax credit, the purchase date is the date when closing occurs and the title to the property transfers to the home owner. A limited exception exists for certain contract for deed purchases and installment sale purchases.
    See the IRS website for more detail.

    However, the law also allows home sales occurring by June 30, 2010 to qualify, provided they are due to a binding sales contract in force on or before April 30, 2010.

    Persons who are claimed as dependents by other taxpayers or who are under age 18 are not qualified for the tax credit program.

  2. What is the definition of a first-time home buyer?
    The law defines “first-time home buyer” as a buyer who has not owned a principal residence during the three-year period prior to the purchase. For married taxpayers, the law tests the homeownership history of both the home buyer and his/her spouse.

    For example, if you have not owned a home in the past three years but your spouse has owned a principal residence, neither you nor your spouse qualifies for the first-time home buyer tax credit. However, IRS Notice 2009-12 allows unmarried joint purchasers to allocate the credit amount to any buyer who qualifies as a first-time buyer, such as may occur if a parent jointly purchases a home with a son or daughter. Ownership of a vacation home or rental property not used as a principal residence does not disqualify a buyer as a first-time home buyer.

  3. How is the amount of the tax credit determined?
    The tax credit is equal to 10 percent of the home’s purchase price up to a maximum of $8,000.

  4. Are there any income limits for claiming the tax credit?
    Yes. For sales occuring after November 6, 2009, the income limit for single taxpayers is $125,000; the limit is $225,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return. The tax credit amount is reduced for buyers with a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of more than $125,000 for single taxpayers and $225,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return. The phaseout range for the tax credit program is equal to $20,000. That is, the tax credit amount is reduced to zero for taxpayers with MAGI of more than $145,000 (single) or $245,000 (married) and is reduced proportionally for taxpayers with MAGIs between these amounts.

  5. The income limits for claiming the tax credit were raised when the tax credit was extended. Are the higher limits retroactive?
    No. The new income limits are only applicable to purchases occurring after November 6, 2009.

    The income limits for sales occuring on or after January 1, 2009 and on or before November 6, 2009 are $75,000 for single taxpayers and $150,000 for married couples filing jointly.

  6. What is “modified adjusted gross income”?
    Modified adjusted gross income or MAGI is defined by the IRS. To find it, a taxpayer must first determine “adjusted gross income” or AGI. AGI is total income for a year minus certain deductions (known as “adjustments” or “above-the-line deductions”), but before itemized deductions from Schedule A or personal exemptions are subtracted. On Forms 1040 and 1040A, AGI is the last number on page 1 and first number on page 2 of the form. For Form 1040-EZ, AGI appears on line 4 (as of 2007). Note that AGI includes all forms of income including wages, salaries, interest income, dividends and capital gains.

    To determine modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), add to AGI certain amounts of foreign-earned income.
    See IRS Form 5405 for more details.

  7. If my modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is above the limit, do I qualify for any tax credit?
    Possibly. It depends on your income. Partial credits of less than $8,000 are available for some taxpayers whose MAGI exceeds the phaseout limits.

  8. Can you give me an example of how the partial tax credit is determined?
    Just as an example, assume that a married couple has a modified adjusted gross income of $235,000. The applicable phaseout to qualify for the tax credit is $225,000, and the couple is $10,000 over this amount. Dividing $10,000 by the phaseout range of $20,000 yields 0.5. When you subtract 0.5 from 1.0, the result is 0.5. To determine the amount of the partial first-time home buyer tax credit that is available to this couple, multiply $8,000 by 0.5. The result is $4,000.

    Here’s another example: assume that an individual home buyer has a modified adjusted gross income of $138,000. The buyer’s income exceeds $125,000 by $13,000. Dividing $13,000 by the phaseout range of $20,000 yields 0.65. When you subtract 0.65 from 1.0, the result is 0.35. Multiplying $8,000 by 0.35 shows that the buyer is eligible for a partial tax credit of $2,800.

    Please remember that these examples are intended to provide a general idea of how the tax credit might be applied in different circumstances. You should always consult your tax advisor for information relating to your specific circumstances.

  9. How is this home buyer tax credit different from the tax credit that Congress enacted in early 2009?
    The tax credit’s income limits were increased, the documentation requirements were tightened, and the program's deadlines were extended.

  10. How do I claim the tax credit? Do I need to complete a form or application? Are there documentation requirements?
    You claim the tax credit on your federal income tax return. Specifically, home buyers should complete
    IRS Form 5405 to determine their tax credit amount, and then claim this amount on line 67 of the 1040 income tax form for 2009 returns (line 69 of the 1040 income tax form for 2008 returns). Please note that although the Form is titled “First-Time Homebuyer Credit,” this is the correct form for claiming both the $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit and $6,500 repeat buyer tax credit.

    No other applications are required, and no pre-approval is necessary. However, you will want to be sure that you qualify for the credit under the income limits and first-time home buyer tests. Note that you cannot claim the credit on Form 5405 for an intended purchase for some future date; it must be a completed purchase. Home buyers must attach a copy of their HUD-1 settlement form (closing statement) to Form 5405 as proof of the completed home purchase. In cases where a HUD-1 form is not used, such as for construction of some new homes, you should attach a copy of the certificate of occupancy in lieu of the HUD-1. Homebuyers should be sure to read the instructions for the revised
    IRS Form 5405 to be sure they meet the new program requirements.

  11. What types of homes will qualify for the tax credit?
    Any home that will be used as a principal residence will qualify for the credit, provided the home is purchased for a price less than or equal to $800,000. This includes single-family detached homes, attached homes like townhouses and condominiums, manufactured homes (also known as mobile homes) and houseboats. The definition of principal residence is identical to the one used to determine whether you may qualify for the $250,000 / $500,000 capital gain tax exclusion for principal residences.

    It is important to note that you cannot purchase a home from, among other family members, your ancestors (parents, grandparents, etc.), your lineal descendants (children, grandchildren, etc.) or your spouse or your spouse’s family members. Please consult with your tax advisor for more information.
    Also see IRS Form 5405.

  12. I read that the tax credit is “refundable.” What does that mean?
    The fact that the credit is refundable means that the home buyer credit can be claimed even if the taxpayer has little or no federal income tax liability to offset. Typically this involves the government sending the taxpayer a check for a portion or even all of the amount of the refundable tax credit.

    For example, if a qualified home buyer expected, notwithstanding the tax credit, federal income tax liability of $5,000 and had tax withholding of $4,000 for the year, then without the tax credit the taxpayer would owe the IRS $1,000 on April 15th. Suppose now that the taxpayer qualified for the $8,000 home buyer tax credit. As a result, the taxpayer would receive a check for $7,000 ($8,000 minus the $1,000 owed).

  13. Instead of buying a new home from a home builder, I hired a contractor to construct a home on a lot that I already own. Do I still qualify for the tax credit?
    Yes. For the purposes of the home buyer tax credit, a principal residence that is constructed by the home owner is treated by the tax code as having been “purchased” on the date the owner first occupies the house. In this situation, the date of first occupancy must be on or after January 1, 2009 and on or before April 30, 2010 (or by June 30, 2010, provided a binding sales contract was in force by April, 30, 2010).

    In contrast, for newly-constructed homes bought from a home builder, eligibility for the tax credit is determined by the settlement date. To provide proof of purchase, homebuyers must attach a copy of the HUD-1 Form or certificate of occupancy to
    IRS Form 5405.

  14. Can I claim the tax credit if I finance the purchase of my home under a mortgage revenue bond (MRB) program?
    Yes. The tax credit can be combined with an MRB home buyer program. Note that first-time home buyers who purchased a home in 2008 may not claim the tax credit if they are participating in an MRB program.

  15. I live in the District of Columbia. Can I claim both the Washington, D.C. first-time home buyer credit and this new credit?
    No. You can claim only one.

  16. I am not a U.S. citizen. Can I claim the tax credit?
    Maybe. Anyone who is not a nonresident alien (as defined by the IRS), who has not owned a principal residence in the previous three years and who meets the income limits test may claim the tax credit for a qualified home purchase. The IRS provides a definition of “nonresident alien” in IRS Publication 519.

  17. Is a tax credit the same as a tax deduction?
    No. A tax credit is a dollar-for-dollar reduction in what the taxpayer owes. That means that a taxpayer who owes $8,000 in income taxes and who receives an $8,000 tax credit would owe nothing to the IRS.

    A tax deduction is subtracted from the amount of income that is taxed. Using the same example, assume the taxpayer is in the 15 percent tax bracket and owes $8,000 in income taxes. If the taxpayer receives an $8,000 deduction, the taxpayer’s tax liability would be reduced by $1,200 (15 percent of $8,000), or lowered from $8,000 to $6,800.

  18. I bought a home in 2008. Do I qualify for this credit?
    No, but if you purchased your first home between April 9, 2008 and January 1, 2009, you may qualify for a different tax credit. Please consult with your tax advisor for more information.

  19. Is there a way for a home buyer to access the money allocable to the credit sooner than waiting to file their 2009 or 2010 tax return?
    Yes. Prospective home buyers who believe they qualify for the tax credit are permitted to reduce their income tax withholding. Reducing tax withholding (up to the amount of the credit) will enable the buyer to accumulate cash by raising his/her take home pay. This money can then be applied to the downpayment.

    Buyers should adjust their withholding amount on their W-4 via their employer or through their quarterly estimated tax payment. IRS Publication 919 contains rules and guidelines for income tax withholding. Prospective home buyers should note that if income tax withholding is reduced and the tax credit qualified purchase does not occur, then the individual would be liable for repayment to the IRS of income tax and possible interest charges and penalties.

    In addition, rule changes made as part of the economic stimulus legislation allow home buyers to claim the tax credit and participate in a program financed by tax-exempt bonds. As a result, some state housing finance agencies have introduced programs that provide short-term second mortgage loans that may be used to fund a downpayment. Prospective home buyers should check with their state housing finance agency to see if such a program is available in their community. To date, 18 state agencies have announced tax credit assistance programs, and more are expected to follow suit. The National Council of State Housing Agencies (NCSHA) has compiled a list of such programs, which can be found
    here.

  20. HUD is now allowing "monetization" of the tax credit. What does that mean?
    It means that HUD allows buyers using FHA-insured mortgages to apply their anticipated tax credit toward their home purchase immediately rather than waiting until they file their 2009 or 2010 income taxes to receive a refund. These funds may be used for certain downpayment and closing cost expenses.

    Under HUD’s guidelines, non-profits and FHA-approved lenders are allowed to give home buyers short-term loans of up to $8,000. The guidelines also allow government agencies, such as state housing finance agencies, to facilitate home sales by providing longer term loans secured by second mortgages.

    Housing finance agencies and other government entities may also issue tax credit loans, which home buyers may use to satisfy the FHA 3.5 percent downpayment requirement. In addition, approved FHA lenders can purchase a home buyer’s anticipated tax credit to pay closing costs and downpayment costs above the 3.5 percent downpayment that is required for FHA-insured homes.

    More information about the guidelines is available on the NAHB web site. Read the HUD mortgagee letter (pdf) and an explanation of the FHA Mortgagee Letter on Tax Credit Monetization (pdf). An FAQ about monetization (pdf) is available at the NAHB web site.

  21. If I’m qualified for the tax credit and buy a home in 2009 (or 2010), can I apply the tax credit against my 2008 (or 2009) tax return?
    Yes. The law allows taxpayers to choose (“elect”) to treat qualified home purchases in 2009 (or 2010) as if the purchase occurred on December 31, 2008 (or if in 2010, December 31, 2009). This means that the previous year’s income limit (MAGI) applies and the election accelerates when the credit can be claimed. A benefit of this election is that a home buyer in 2009 or 2010 will know their prior year MAGI with certainty, thereby helping the buyer know whether the income limit will reduce their credit amount.

    Taxpayers buying a home who wish to claim it on their prior year tax return, but who have already submitted their tax return to the IRS, may file an amended return claiming the tax credit using Form 1040X. You should consult with a tax professional to determine how to arrange this.

  22. For a home purchase in 2009 or 2010, can I choose whether to treat the purchase as occurring in the prior or present year, depending on in which year my credit amount is the largest?
    Yes. If the applicable income phaseout would reduce your home buyer tax credit amount in the present year and a larger credit would be available using the prior year MAGI amounts, then you can choose the year that yields the largest credit amount.

  23. How can two unmarried buyers allocate the tax credit if one qualifies for the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit and the other qualifies for the $6,500 repeat home buyer credit?
    The buyers can allocate the tax credit in any reasonable manner, provided neither claims a tax credit higher than the one they qualify for
    and the home purchase does not yield a total of more than $8,000 in tax credits. For example, the repeat home buyer could claim $6,500 and the first-time home buyer could claim $1,500. Alternatively, both buyers could claim a $4,000 tax credit.
  24. Does a married couple qualify for any home buyer tax credit in the following situation? Spouse A has lived in and owned the same principal residence for at least five years. Spouse B has lived in and owned the same principal residence for less than five years.
    In this situation, the couple does not qualify for any home buyer tax credit. Because the couple is married, the law tests the ownership history of
    both spouses. Spouse A clearly does not qualify for the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit, so neither does Spouse B.

    Spouse A does appear to qualify for the $6,500 repeat buyer credit, but because Spouse B has not owned and lived in the same principal residence for at least five years, neither of them can claim the repeat home buyer tax credit.
The above information was provided by the National Association of Home Builders. If you have any additional questions or comments. Please let me know. Thank you and have a great day!

It's March 12, 2010 and I am very Bullish on Sacramento!

David Ohara
@dwo34
dwo34@aol.com